Flyby News Home - Flyby News Archives - Casinni NoFlyby - Flyby Links

Flyby  News

"News Fit to Transmit in the Post Cassini Flyby Era"

Pre-9/11 Intel * War On Consciousness

April 18, 2007

"The attack on 911 was planned,
organized, and committed by treasonous perpetrators
that have infiltrated the highest levels of our government."

-- Colonel Guy S. Razer

USAF - (ret.) -- Pilots for 911 truth

1) French Intelligence Warned CIA of 9/11 Plot in January 2001
- - Request for Correction to 9/11 NIST Report
- - Book Review of Debunking 9/11 Myths
- - "The Third Stage" 9/11 TRUTH 20-minute video
- - Bringing Down the House of Cards -- The Final 'Leg' of the Journey
- - The War On Consciousness
2) Moyers Documentary Blasts Bush Lies, Media Complicity
- - Struggles Against Unfair Death Sentence
- - 9/11 Truth Swarming Out of the Valleys

Editor’s Notes:

As many of you know, we are currently engaged in an unprecedented 9/11 truth tour with Michael Berger and film, Improbable Collapse: The Demolition of our Republic. According to Stephen Goodale, co-founder for Valley 9/11 Truth, Mike Berger “ blowing people out of the water with his incredible knowledge of details about 9/11 in so many different areas!” You can attend his presentations for two weeks straight and still learn something new and important each time. In this issue is a book review by William Veale, who is running for Senate in California, and working with Mike Berger for convening a Citizen’s Grand Jury for 9/11 truth in Washington D.C. this summer. The information for cover-up and high crimes is evident.

Item one includes a special article called THE WAR ON CONSCIOUSNESS. Also note the article by Steve Bhaerman with the courage and intellect to confront the realities regarding 9/11/01. This Bhaerman article was posted on David Swanson’s site, Swanson writes in the second item about an upcoming Bill Moyers special -- showing multiple lies from Bush and gang, and the media’s complicity. Even Bill Moyers misses (by a long shot) the number of deaths of innocent people in Iraq. Following this is an item on an Indiana prisoner, Zola Agona Azania, requesting our support in stopping the unfair use of the death penalty in his case. The last piece is my letter to the editor of the Valley Advocate. Since being ignored by this and other local “alternative” news outlets -- at least FN will publish it. Please note that 9/11 truth is growing, and plans are in the works for a Manchester NH September 11 event, and an October international conference with in Hartford, CT this October.

A partial sunrise comes to mind
in half empty spaces
filling the void
to dream and yet to awaken
when time has no space
and memory listens no more.

1) French Intelligence Warned CIA of 9/11 Plot in January 2001

- - Request for Correction to 9/11 NIST Report
- - Book Review of Debunking 9/11 Myths
- - "The Third Stage" 9/11 TRUTH 20-minute video
- - Bringing Down the House of Cards -- The Final 'Leg' of the Journey
- - The War On Consciousness

French Intelligence Warned CIA of 9/11 Plot in January 2001
Posted by on Wednesday, April 18 2007

A new and shocking revelation of 9/11 foreknowledge comes from a story in Le Monde Guillaume Dasquie. In it we learn that western-allied intelligence had infiltrated Al-Qaeda up to its highest levels well before 9/11, and that detailed reports of plans to hijack airlines, including possible airlines that might be targeted, were delivered to the CIA by January 2001. In all, NINE memoranda, including a five-page summary entitled "Airplane Hijacking Plans By Radical Islamists" were delivered to US intelligence between September 2000 and August 2001.

There is also this bombshell:

The formulation of the January 2001 French memorandum clearly indicates that other sources were corroborating this intelligence about Al-Qaeda's plans. In accordance with a well-oiled machine in Afghanistan, [French intelligence agency] DGSE did not limit itself to exchanges with friendly foreign secret services. To penetrate the secrets of the camps, it, on the one hand, manipulated and "turned" young jihad candidates from the suburbs of Europe's great cities.

There is an excellent discussion thread at Democratic Underground which discusses other aspects of this story and offers commentary on the significance of this revelation.

This explosive story is still developing and we will update it as events warrant.

— Ed.

September 11, 2001: The French Knew Much About It
By Guillaume Dasquié
Le Monde
Monday 16 April 2004

It's an impressive mass of documents. From a distance, one would imagine a doctoral thesis. On closer inspection: nothing of the kind. Red stamps "Confidential-Defense" and "Strictly National Usage" on every page. At the top on the left, a royal blue logo: that of the DGSE, Direction générale des services extérieurs [General Directorate for Foreign Services], the French secret services. In total, 328 classified pages. Notes, reports, syntheses and summaries, maps, graphs, organization charts, satellite photos. All exclusively devoted to al-Qaeda, its leaders, its seconds-in-command, its hide-outs and training camps. Also to its financial supports. Nothing less than the fundamentals of the DGSE reports compiled between July 2000 and October 2001. A veritable encyclopedia.

Read more:

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

- - Request for Correction to 9/11 NIST Report

Scholars and Family Members Submit Request for Correction to 9/11 NIST Report

Gaps and inconsistencies reveal fundamental flaws in NIST's building collapse analyses

Berkeley, CA (PRWEB) April 14, 2007 -- A group of scientists, researchers and 9/11 family members challenging the official reports of the destruction of the World Trade Center Towers on 9/11/01 has filed a Request for Correction (RFC) with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).

The Request asserts that the NIST Final Report violates information quality standards, draws inferences that are inconsistent with its own computer simulations and physical tests, and exhibits a significant bias toward a preordained conclusion while ignoring available evidence contrary to it. The Request also says that if this bias is corrected, the NIST simulation clearly indicates that the Towers should not have collapsed due to plane damage and fire. The obvious alternative, which the group says should have been studied by NIST, is explosive demolition.

The group submitting the Request includes 9/11 family members Bob McIlvaine and Bill Doyle, physicist Steven E. Jones, former UL manager, Kevin Ryan, architect Richard Gage, AIA, and the group Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice.

A key theme of the Request is a call for NIST to reveal more of the data behind the Report's statements. Steven Jones, a physicist in Utah, says of the Report, "Among other things, we've found that the Report violates information quality standards by leaving out necessary information which would allow its conclusions to be verified."

But what's worse, Jones says, "when you read the Report, you find some data that don't support the conclusion are simply being ignored. That's a big red flag."

The assertion that the conclusion of the NIST report is incorrect is important, the Request says, because that "would mean that the assumption that foreign terrorists alone carried out the destruction would become a matter of dispute."

James Gourley, the attorney working with the Request group, says the public has a right to see the data and ensure their validity. "We think that the American people deserve the chance to be allowed to analyze the computer models and the calculations that they have paid for. We also think Bob McIlvaine and Bill Doyle, each of whom lost a son in the WTC Towers, deserve a scientifically sound answer from NIST about how their sons were killed."

The group says that a different conclusion better fits the evidence - they believe that pre-positioned explosives were responsible for the destruction of the WTC towers. "It sounds outlandish," Jones says, "But when you look at the evidence, it fits. In fact, many of the physical features of these events -- such as their rapidity, totality, and the observed iron-rich spheres in the WTC dust -- fit the demolition hypothesis and are difficult to reconcile with any of the existing collapse explanations."

Truncated, for the complete article, see:
also posted:

A PDF of the Request for Correction is available here:
Contact: Victoria Ashley,, 510-769-5109

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

- - Book Review of Debunking 9/11 Myths

Book Review: Debunking 9/11 Myths, by Popular Mechanics
by Bill Veale

Maybe the life of the nation is at stake, and maybe it isn’t. Maybe this is a time of unprecedented tyranny, and maybe it is simply what was just out of view on the same road we have been traveling for the last seventy years. Maybe this was a sea change and a quantum leap, or maybe it was neither. Regardless of the proper description of the event and this time in history, 9/11 has become an opportunity. Scattered in the rubble of the destroyed buildings and what’s left of the bill of rights is a particle of hope.

Truncated, for the complete article, see:
also posted:

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

- - "The Third Stage" 9/11 TRUTH 20-minute video
Finally - In one brilliant 20min video nutshell!

[Following received via email]:

"The attack on 911 was planned, organized and committed
by treasonous perpetrators that have infiltrated the highest
levels of our government."

-- Colonel Guy S. Razer USAF (ret.).
Pilots for 911 truth.

Over the past few years I’ve received hundreds — I’d venture thousands —
of questions about 9/11 that covered, among others, the following areas:

The chilling PNAC documents — the conceptual blueprint for a “New Pearl Harbor”
Various military exercises that were underway on the morning of 9/11
Insider trading — billions in put options on United and American Airlines
The hastely-created (certainly pre-constructed) Patriot Act
The mystery hijackers not listed in any of the airline manifests
The dancing Israelis later exposed to be Mossad agents
“Lucky Larry” Silverstein, his connections to Israeli powerbrokers,
his colossal insurance scam
Building 7, struck by nothing yet collapsed like a pillar of sand
The offices that were in Building 7 — SEC, NSA, CIA...
Explosives in the three towers
Testimony of international demolition experts
Molten metal
The physics of “Freefall”
Testimony of firemen, police personnel and rescue workers
The strange Anthrax attacks--directed only at opponents of the official line
Able Danger/Able Warrior and the handlers who controlled the Arab patsies
...And lots more

Well, we finally have the answer, all crammed into
one brilliant 20-minute blockbuster video.

PLEASE...take just 20 minutes of your time NOW...or during your lunch break...
or at home this weekend, but watch it you must — before it’s
permanently taken down like so many other excellent pieces before it.

Watch "The Third Stage" 20min video at

They promised us a “Hundred-year War”.
"The Third Stage" 20min video shows you how they launched it !

This video can also be viewed on Google video at:

Please circulate widely.

9/11 was an inside job. Our nation is in peril.
The perpetrators are in positions of power.
Demand a new investigation.
Stand up. Be counted.

Air Force Fighter Pilot and Instructor Comes Out for 9/11 Truth
Lt. Col. Guy S. Razer

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

- - Bringing Down the House of Cards -- The Final 'Leg' of the Journey

Posted by April 17 2007
Bringing Down the House of Cards -- The Final 'Leg' of the Journey
The New 'Not-Seeism' Coming to an End?

We are very glad to post this heartfelt and important opinion piece from Steve Bhaerman posted at It tells of his personal experience as someone who would 'Not-See'. But in part through confronting the evidence compiled by DRG in "The New Pearl Harbor", he realized he had to open his mind to the possibility that US elements could have had a hand in the 9/11 attacks.

Mr. Bhaerman also makes a critical point about the most promising approach to spreading 9/11 skepticism:

There seem to be two approaches to the 9/11 issue. One involves jumping into the details of the mystery itself and trying to figure out specifically what happened. The problem here is what has already occurred -- squabbling about the details, one group of believers in one conspiracy theory accusing another of spreading disinformation.

The other approach is the one I took with the David Ray Griffin article I published last year. Focus on stepping outside the official story, removing its "halo" and asking if indeed, it is the likeliest story. Here's why. No amount of "evidence" will convince anybody unless they are open to the possibility of the premise. The breakthrough will occur when a critical mass of people begin to put it together for themselves.

We are grateful to Mr. Bhaerman for sharing this timely account of his willingness to consider something he once believed 'beyond the pale', and we are also very heartened to see deemed it valuable enough to share with its readers. We are also grateful for the reminder from someone who was very recently outside our ranks that while the community of 9/11 skeptics has a responsibility to conduct individual investigations of the crime as far as the available evidence will support, we also must try to create an atmosphere whereby a critical mass of people will be compelled to cast aside there own 'not-seeism'.

— Ed.

Bringing Down the House of Cards

The Final "Leg" of the Journey
By Steve Bhaerman
For the editor’s note and complete article, see:

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

- - The War On Consciousness
By Paul Levy

We are truly in a war. It is not the war we imagine we are in, which is the way our true adversaries want it. It is not a foreign war against a foreign enemy. It is a war on consciousness, a war on our own minds. The global war on terror that is being fought around the world is an embodied reflection in the material world of a deeper, more fundamental war that is going on in the realm of consciousness itself.

We have the most criminal regime in all of our history wreaking unspeakable horror on the entire planet, while simultaneously waging war on the consciousness of its own citizens - US. If we aren't aware of this, we are unwittingly playing into, supporting and complicit in the evil that is being perpetrated in our name.

A government's war on the consciousness of its own citizens is by no means unique to the Bush administration. Abusing power over others so as to limit their freedom is an archetypal process that has been endlessly re-enacted by governments throughout history in various forms. With the Bush administration, however, the pathological aspect of this process has become so exaggerated and amped-up to such a degree that it is just about impossible not to notice its staggering malignancy. With the Bush administration, the underlying evil that has played out in our government over many years is becoming overwhelmingly obvious for all to see. With the Bush administration, the underlying evil that informs systems of government that are based on "power over" instead of "liberty for" is coming out from hiding in the shadows. Instead of being acted out underground, our government is acting out this evil above ground, in plain sight, for all who are courageous enough to look.

Impeaching Bush and Co. ultimately won't change anything unless we deal with the corrupt powers which control and direct them.

Truncated, for the complete article, see:

2) Moyers Documentary Blasts Bush Lies, Media Complicity

- - Struggles Against Unfair Death Sentence
- - 9/11 Truth Swarming Out of the Valleys

Moyers Documentary Blasts Bush Lies, Media Complicity
By David Swanson 4-13-7

Published on (
Record of Iraq War Lies to Air April 25 on PBS
By David Swanson

Bill Moyers has put together an amazing 90-minute video documenting the lies that the Bush administration told to sell the Iraq War to the American public, with a special focus on how the media led the charge. I've watched an advance copy and read a transcript, and the most important thing I can say about it is: Watch PBS from 9 to 10:30 p.m. on Wednesday, April 25. Spending that 90 minutes on this will actually save you time, because you'll never watch television news again – not even on PBS, which comes in for its share of criticism.

While a great many pundits, not to mention presidents, look remarkably stupid or dishonest in the four-year-old clips included in "Buying the War," it's hard to take any spiteful pleasure in holding them to account, and not just because the killing and dying they facilitated is ongoing, but also because of what this video reveals about the mindset of members of the DC media. Moyers interviews media personalities, including Dan Rather, who clearly both understand what the media did wrong and are unable to really see it as having been wrong or avoidable.

It's great to see an American media outlet tell this story so well, but it leads one to ask: When will Congress tell it? While the Democrats were in the minority, they clamored for hearings and investigations, they pushed Resolutions of Inquiry into the White House Iraq Group and the Downing Street Minutes. Now, in the majority, they've gone largely silent. The chief exception is the House Judiciary Committee's effort to question Condoleezza Rice next week about the forged Niger documents.

But what comes out of watching this show is a powerful realization that no investigation is needed by Congress, just as no hidden information was needed for the media to get the story right in the first place. The claims that the White House made were not honest mistakes. But neither were they deceptions. They were transparent and laughably absurd falsehoods. And they were high crimes and misdemeanors.

The program opens with video of President Bush saying "Iraq is part of a war on terror. It's a country that trains terrorists, it's a country that can arm terrorists. Saddam Hussein and his weapons are a direct threat to this country."

Was that believable or did the media play along? The next shot is of a press conference at which Bush announces that he has a script telling him which reporters to call on in what order. Yet the reporters play along, raising their hands after each comment, pretending that they might be called on despite the script.

Video shows Richard Perle claiming that Saddam Hussein worked with al Qaeda and that Iraqis would greet American occupiers as liberators. Here are the Weekly Standard, the Wall Street Journal, William Safire at the New York Times, Charles Krauthammer and Jim Hoagland at the Washington Post all demanding an overthrow of Iraq's government. George Will is seen saying that Hussein "has anthrax, he loves biological weapons, he has terrorist training camps, including 747s to practice on."

But was that even plausible? Bob Simon of "60 Minutes" tells Moyers he wasn't buying it. He says he saw the idea of a connection between Hussein and al Qaeda as an absurdity: "Saddam, as most tyrants, was a total control freak. He wanted total control of his regime. Total control of the country. And to introduce a wild card like al Qaeda in any sense was just something he would not do. So I just didn't believe it for an instant."

Knight Ridder Bureau Chief John Walcott didn't buy it either. He assigned Warren Strobel and Jonathan Landay to do the reporting, and they found the Bush claims to be quite apparently false. For example, when the Iraqi National Congress (INC) fed the New York Times' Judith Miller a story through an Iraqi defector claiming that Hussein had chemical and biological weapons labs under his house, Landay noticed that the source was a Kurd, making it very unlikely he would have learned such secrets. But Landay also noticed that it was absurd to imagine someone putting a biological weapons lab under his house.

But absurd announcements were the order of the day. A video clip shows a Fox anchor saying "A former top Iraqi nuclear scientist tells Congress Iraq could build three nuclear bombs by 2005." And the most fantastic stories of all were fed to David Rose at Vanity Fair Magazine. We see a clip of him saying "The last training exercise was to blow up a full size mock up of a US destroyer in a lake in central Iraq."

Landay comments: "Or jumping into pits of fouled water and having to kill a dog with your bare teeth. I mean, this was coming from people, who are appearing in all of these stories, and sometimes their rank would change."

Forged documents from Niger could not have gotten noticed in this stew of lies. Had there been some real documents honestly showing something, that might have stood out and caught more eyes. Walcott describes the way the INC would feed the same info to the Vice President and Secretary of Defense that it fed to a reporter, and the reporter would then get the claims confirmed by calling the White House or the Pentagon. Landay adds: "And let's not forget how close these people were to this administration, which raises the question, was there coordination? I can't tell you that there was, but it sure looked like it."

Simon from 60 Minutes tells Moyers that when the White House claimed a 9-11 hijacker had met with a representative of the Iraqi government in Prague, 60 Minutes was easily able to make a few calls and find out that there was no evidence for the claim. "If we had combed Prague," he says, "and found out that there was absolutely no evidence for a meeting between Mohammad Atta and the Iraqi intelligence figure. If we knew that, you had to figure the administration knew it. And yet they were selling the connection between Al Qaeda and Saddam."

Moyers questions a number of people about their awful work, including Dan Rather, Peter Beinart, and then Chairman and CEO of CNN Walter Isaacson. And he questions Simon, who soft-pedaled the story and avoided reporting that there was no evidence.

Landay at Knight Ridder did report the facts when it counted, but not enough people paid attention. He tells Moyers that all he had to do was read the UN weapons inspectors reports online to know the White House was lying to us. When Cheney said that Hussein was close to acquiring nuclear weapons, Landay knew he was lying: "You need tens of thousands of machines called 'centrifuges' to produce highly enriched uranium for a nuclear weapon. You've got to house those in a fairly big place, and you've got to provide a huge amount of power to this facility."

Moyers also hits Tim Russert with a couple of tough questions. Russert expressed regret for not having included any skeptical voices by saying he wished his phone had rung. So, Moyers begins the next segment by saying "Bob Simon didn't wait for the phone to ring," and describing Simon's reporting. Simon says he knew the claims about aluminum tubes were false because 60 Minutes called up some scientists and researchers and asked them. Howard Kurtz of the Washington Post says that skeptical stories did not get placed on the front page because they are not "definitive."

Moyers shows brief segments of an Oprah show in which she has on only pro-war guests and silences a caller who questions some of the White House claims. Just in time for the eternal election season, Moyers includes clips of Hillary Clinton and John Kerry backing the war on the basis of Bush and Cheney's lies. But we also see clips of Robert Byrd and Ted Kennedy getting it right.

The Washington Post editorialized in favor of the war 27 times, and published in 2002 about 1,000 articles and columns on the war. But the Post gave a huge anti-war march a total of 36 words. "What got even less ink," Moyers says, "was the release of the National Intelligence Estimate." Even the misleading partial version that the media received failed to fool a careful eye.

Landay recalls: "It said that the majority of analysts believed that those tubes were for the nuclear weapons program. It turns out, though, that the majority of intelligence analysts had no background in nuclear weapons." Was Landay the only one capable of noticing this detail?

Colin Powell's UN presentation comes in for similar quick debunking. We watch a video clip of Powell complaining that Iraq has covered a test stand with a roof. But AP reporter Charles Hanley comments: "What he neglected to mention was that the inspectors were underneath watching what was going on."

Powell cited a UK paper, but it very quickly came out that the paper had been plagiarized from a college student's work found online. The British press pointed that out. The US let it slide. But anyone looking for the facts found it quickly.

Moyers' wonderful movie is marred by a single line, the next to the last sentence, in which he says: "The number of Iraqis killed, over 35,000 last year alone, is hard to pin down." A far more accurate figure could have been found very easily.

[FN-note – according to a 2006 Washington Post article:
“Study Claims Iraq's 'Excess' Death Toll Has Reached 655,000” –

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

- - Struggles Against Unfair Death Sentence
by Zolo Agona Azania

Indiana Death Row Prisoner
Struggles Against Unfair Death Sentence

Michigan City, IN - A specially appointed judge ruled on May 1, 2005 that the State of Indiana could not seek a third death penalty against Zolo Agona Azania, who previously had two death sentences overturned on appeal, because of "fundamental principles of fairness, due process, and speedy justice." Despite no longer being under a death penalty, Zolo Azania is still on death row while Indiana prosecutors appeal the judge’s order. If the judge’s order barring the death penalty is upheld, Zolo could be released from prison in five years.

An all-white jury convicted Zolo, who is Black, in February 1982, for the 1981 murder of a white, Gary, Indiana, police officer in the course of a bank robbery. Zolo did not receive a fair trial, and has always maintained his non-involvement in the crime. On May 25, 1982, he became the first person in Allen County to be sentenced to death since 1959.

In 1993 the Indiana Supreme Court vacated Zolo’s death sentence - while failing to overturn his conviction - holding that the state had withheld favorable evidence (results of a gunshot residue test termed "inconclusive" as to whether Zolo had fired a gun). The court also found that Zolo’s trial counsel had provided ineffective assistance (he was so intimidated by the police-state atmosphere surrounding the trial that he didn’t sit at the same table as Zolo; he failed to interview defense witnesses; he put on no evidence during the trial or the death penalty phase). After a second sentencing trial in 1996, a jury composed of 11 whites and no Blacks resentenced Zolo to death.

Truncated, for the complete article, see:

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

- - 9/11 Truth Swarming Out of the Valleys
Open Letter to the Valley Advocate from Valley 9/11 Truth founder,
Jonathan Mark

Dear Editor,

I tend to agree with much of the news reporting from the Advocate. For instance, referring to the April 5th issue, "Crappy News Network" and "Privelage and Perversion," these editorials show integrity and perspective in exposing the falsehoods of mainstream media, but something is missing. For those demanding a new investigation regarding the crimes of September 11, 2001, alternative media like the Valley Advocate and "Democracy Now!" are missing the point in barely dealing with the most significant story of our time.

Even the heroics of Rosie O'Donnell speaking out on ABC TV. "The View," was not enough to give the Advocate pause and expose the weirdness of why building number 7 collapsed at the third World Trade Center. As former professor of Physics, Steven Jones said: "The dramatic collapse of World Trade Center 7 is something everyone ought to see It really does have the characteristics of an explosive demolition." Rosie agrees, what about the Advocate?

I hope you print this letter and report on the first northeast tour for revealing the truth about 9/11. The film, Improbable Collapse: The Demolition of Our Republic is on tour for two weeks with the support of 9/11 truth groups across five states. It began on April 10, 2007 when Michael Berger presented his film at the University of Hartford, with Q & A following. On the next day he presented this program at the First Churches in Northampton, and will be coming back to our area at Hampshire College on April 23rd.

For people wanting to stop a renegade government, and a manipulated corporate-run media, and a complicit Congress, re-investigating 9/11/01 may be our best opportunity. For more on our local organizations sponsoring this tour, please visit- and

Thank You.

Jonathan Mark
Publisher - Flyby News
co-founder - Valley 9/11 Truth

The views expressed herein are the writers' own and not necessarily those of Flyby News.
A "Fair Use Policy" that describes FNs' use of copyrighted material is posted at
Your feedback for story suggestions and networking Flyby News are welcomed and appreciated.
You can write to the publisher/editor Jonathan Mark via email:
If you would like to receive more Flyby News alerts for the New England
region, send an email to & insert "subscribe" in subject

Flyby News is educational and nonviolent in focus, and has supported critical campaigns
for a healthy environment, human rights, justice, peace, and nonviolence,
since the launching of NASA's Cassini space probe in 1997.

=====News Fit to Transmit in the Post Cassini Flyby Era====>

= = = = = = = = = = =

Email address: