"News Fit to Transmit in the Post Cassini Flyby Era"
UN uprising * 9/11 in streets * Diebold
22 September 2006"The hegemonic pretensions of the American empire are placing
at risk the very survival of the human species. We continue to warn
you about this danger and we appeal to the people of the United States
and the world to halt this threat, which is like a sword hanging over our heads."
-- President Hugo Chavez
Rise Up Against the Empire
Address to the United Nations
September 20, 20061) United Nations Uprising
- - Bolivian President Evo Morales with Democracy Now!
- - Hugo Chavez: Rise Up Against the Empire
- - Hugo Chavez: An Exclusive Interview with Greg Palast2) Taking to the Streets on 9/11
- - Democracy Now! 9/11 Debate
- - Film Review: 9/11 Press for Truth
- - 911 DVD Project – Get the Truth Out3) Brad’s Blog – RFK New Diebold Expose
This issue begins with a new sort of uprising.. coming from a more traditional viewpoint for democracy by leaders of nations south of the US border. Their reasoning for peace is based on their actions, rather than the confusing lingo of the President of the US with the rhetoric for peace while taking actions for world domination and war. The second item has more on the reverberations of last September 11. In Northampton, MA, watching Loose Change with an overflowing capacity audience, and following through with penetrating discussions, distributing resources, was joining a movement coming alive, and resisting the war actions of our so-called representative government, or dictatorship. Item 3 has more from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. on the election theft of 2004.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Western Mass 9/11 Truth Alliance
will be participating in two public film events:
On Tuesday, October 10th in Amherst, MA,
9/11 Press for Truth,
a film about the 9/11 victim families will be presented
by its screen writer, Kyle Hence at Hampshire College,
Franklin Patterson Main Lecture Hall; 7:00 pm
Thursday, October 19th, 7pm at the Media Education Foundation
The 9/11 Truth Alliance will be presenting a new film called:
Part 1: Demolitions
Note these following comments on this film:
"Excellent. The best of the 9/11 movies."
--David Ray Griffin,
author of The New Pearl Harbor
"WOW! is my reaction to this movie. Great insight into demolitions
and what really happened on 9/11/2001."
-- Steven E. Jones,
physics professor, Brigham Young University
"An outstanding contribution to understanding 9/11. Simply superb."
-- James H. Fetzer,
Scholars for 911 Truth
1) United Nations Uprising
- - Bolivian President Evo Morales with Democracy Now!
- - Hugo Chavez: Rise Up Against the Empire
- - Hugo Chavez: An Exclusive Interview with Greg Palast- - Bolivian President Evo Morales with Democracy Now!
Friday, September 22nd, 2006
Bolivian President Evo Morales on Latin America, U.S. Foreign Policy and the Role of the Indigenous People of Bolivia
Highlights from the interview:
* Morales calls for the U.S. to extradite former Bolivian president Gonzalo Sanchez de Lozada to face trial for killing over 100 people. " A government that says it fights against terrorism, for human rights, against corruption, it’s not conceivable that this person would still be here [in the United States]," Morales said.
* Morales calls on oil companies to be partners not bosses. "The investor has the right to recuperate their investment and to a reasonable profit," Morales said. "But we can’t allow for the sacking of the country and only the companies benefiting, not the people."
* Morales reveals for the first time how Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva pressured Morales over his plan to nationalize Bolivia's energy resources. "I was attacked. Lula was rough with me," Morales said. [includes rush transcript]
Ten months ago, Evo Morales made history when he became the country's first indigenous leader. At his inauguration in January, he declared the end of Bolivia's colonial and neo-liberal era. Since then he has moved to nationalize parts of the country's vast energy reserves and strengthen Bolivia's ties to Venezuela and Cuba.
Morales' rise to power began with his leadership of the coca growers union and his high-profile opposition to the U.S.-funded eradication of the coca crop. He helped to lead the street demonstrations by Indian and union groups that toppled the country's last two presidents.
On Tuesday, Morales spoke for the first time before the United Nations General Assembly in New York. He vowed to never yield to U.S. pressure to criminalize coca production. During his speech he held up a coca leaf even though it is banned in the United States.
Juan Gonzalez and I sat down with Bolivian President Evo Morales for one of his first extended televised interviews in the United States.
* Evo Morales, President of Bolivia.
AMY GOODMAN: Welcome to Democracy Now! and the United States, President Evo Morales. Why did you bring a coca leaf to the United Nations?
PRESIDENT EVO MORALES: [translated] First of all, thanks very much for the invitation to speak with you today. It’s the first time I’ve been in these lands, the United States. And as the coca leaf has been permanently accused of being a drug, so I brought the leaf to demonstrate that the coca leaf is not a drug. The coca leaf is green. It’s not white. So I came to show that the coca leaf is not a drug and it can be beneficial to humanity. So that’s why I was there at the first ordinary session at the United Nations with a coca leaf. Had it been a drug, I would have been detained certainly. We’re starting the campaign to bring dignity back to the coca leaf, starting with the decriminalization of the coca leaf.
AMY GOODMAN: How is it used for beneficial purposes? Why is it so important to you in Bolivia?
PRESIDENT EVO MORALES: [translated] The coca leaf is part of culture. There is legal consumption, traditional consumption, which is called the piccheo in Bolivia, the chaccheo in Peru, el mambeo in Colombia, which is the traditional chewing of coca. Moreover, this traditional consumption is backed up by scientific research done in universities in Europe and the United States. Not long ago a study came out of Harvard University that said it’s a very nutritious – it’s a good source of nutrition, that it can not only be used through chewing, but could also be consumed through eating. The last study done by the World Health Organization has demonstrated clearly that the coca leaf does no harm to people.
And there’s also ritual uses, including in the Aymara culture, for example, when you ask for someone’s hand in marriage, the coca leaf plays an important part in that ritual. We could also talk about a number of pharmaceutical products that come or derive from the coca leaf. The first local anesthetics that were used in modern medicine were derived from the coca leaf. Up to some five, six, seven years ago, there was a company from the United States that used to come to the Chapare to buy coca to be exported to the United States for the use in making Coca-Cola. And we can think of a lot of products, industrial products, that could be derived from the coca leaf that would be beneficial to humanity.
JUAN GONZALEZ: Mr. President, in the United States voters here are accustomed to leaders promising much, but when they get into office delivering very little. Since you have become president in Bolivia, you have moved rapidly to make changes. You’ve cut your own salary. You’ve raised the minimum wage by 50%. What is the message you are trying to send to your own people and to Latin American leaders in general?
PRESIDENT EVO MORALES: [translated] I never wanted to be a politician. In my country, politicians are seen as liars, thieves, arrogant people. In 1997 they tried to get me to run for president. I rejected that idea, even though that brought me problems with my own grassroots organizations. Then I was later obligated to become a member of the lower house of parliament. I didn’t want to do that at the time, either. I preferred to be the head of a rat than the tail of a horse. I preferred to be the head of my own organizations fighting for human rights and fighting for the rights of the members, and not getting involved in electoral political processes and wind up not fulfilling promises.
But what I was learning in that period in ’95, ’96, ’97, is that to get involved in politics means taking on the responsibility, a new way of looking at politics as serving the people, because to get into politics means service. And after hearing the demands, the broad demands of our grassroots organizations, I decided finally to run for president.
And for the last elections, we had a ten-point program. And of those ten, we’ve fulfilled six already. The austerity measures that you mentioned a moment ago, I cut my own salary by more than 50%, and the ministers’ as well as also the members of congress, and that money has been redirected to health and education, convinced of the idea that to arrive at the presidency means that you’re there to serve the people. And we said we were going to do a consultation for a referendum on autonomy, greater autonomy for the regions, and we’ve done that. 58% of the population said no to greater autonomy, although it is important to secure more autonomy for the regions and the indigenous communities.
We said we were going to nationalize the gas and oil sector. We did, without expropriating or kicking out any of the companies. We said it’s important to have partners, but not bosses. And we did it. The investor has the right to recuperate their investment and to a reasonable profit, but we can’t allow for the sacking of the country and only the companies benefiting, not the people. I just came from a meeting of political analysts, foreign policy analysts here, and they seemed to understand our proposals.
The struggle against corruption, it’s a key issue in my country. We’re starting that campaign aggressively, starting with members of the executive branch. The judicial branch still is not accompanying this process. And I can talk a lot about the other things that we’re doing to meet the demands that were accumulated over time. For example, the centers for eye treatments and surgery, the literacy work that we’re doing.
We’ve also made advances in terms of giving people legal documents, something that oftentimes indigenous peoples don’t have. These are the social problems that my family has lived. My mother, for example, never had an ID. She didn’t know when she was born. There’s an anecdote about my father. One day I found his ID, and there was a birthdate on it. I said to my sister Esther, “Okay, let’s have a party. We know what my father’s birthday is.” She was very happy. She said, “Yes, let’s do this birthday party.” We said to my father, “We’re going to do a party for you.” And he said, “But I don’t know what my birthday is.” We showed him his ID, and we said, “Here it is. Here’s your birthday.” And he said very bitterly, “I had to invent that date when I was drafted in the military.” My father didn’t know when he was born.
And when I was in a big political rally in 1999 in the electoral campaigns for the municipalities and I asked everybody there to raise their hand, “Who’s going to vote?” About two-thirds of the people raised their hands. Another third didn’t raise their hand, and I said, “What’s going on here? You’re not going to vote for Evo Morales?” And they all said, “We don’t have IDs. We don’t have documents.” And one companero came to me almost in tears. He said, “This society thinks I’m only useful for raising my hands or giving assent to something, but I’m not good enough to vote.” He was from northern Potosi, from the highlands. He didn’t know when he was born. He didn’t have a birth certificate. These are the sorts of problems. But with the help of some countries, we’re receiving support so we can give people documents to fully incorporate them as citizens.
Truncated, for the complete article, see:www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/09/22/1323211
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = - - Hugo Chavez: Rise Up Against the Empire
Address to the United Nations
Rise Up Against the Empire
By HUGO CHAVEZ
September 20, 2006
..The hegemonic pretensions of the American empire are placing at risk the very survival of the human species. We continue to warn you about this danger and we appeal to the people of the United States and the world to halt this threat, which is like a sword hanging over our heads.
Yesterday, ladies and gentlemen, from this rostrum, the president of the United States, the gentleman to whom I refer as the devil, came here, talking as if he owned the world. Truly. As the owner of the world.
I think we could call a psychiatrist to analyze yesterday's statement made by the president of the United States. As the spokesman of imperialism, he came to share his nostrums, to try to preserve the current pattern of domination, exploitation and pillage of the peoples of the world.
They say they want to impose a democratic model. But that's their democratic model. It's the false democracy of elites, and, I would say, a very original democracy that's imposed by weapons and bombs and firing weapons.
What a strange democracy. Aristotle might not recognize it or others who are at the root of democracy.
What type of democracy do you impose with marines and bombs?
The president of the United States, yesterday, said to us, right here, in this room, and I'm quoting, "Anywhere you look, you hear extremists telling you can escape from poverty and recover your dignity through violence, terror and martyrdom."
Wherever he looks, he sees extremists. And you, my brother -- he looks at your color, and he says, oh, there's an extremist. Evo Morales, the worthy president of Bolivia, looks like an extremist to him.
The imperialists see extremists everywhere. It's not that we are extremists. It's that the world is waking up. It's waking up all over. And people are standing up.
I have the feeling, dear world dictator, that you are going to live the rest of your days as a nightmare because the rest of us are standing up, all those who are rising up against American imperialism, who are shouting for equality, for respect, for the sovereignty of nations.
Yes, you can call us extremists, but we are rising up against the empire, against the model of domination.
The president then -- and this he said himself, he said: "I have come to speak directly to the populations in the Middle East, to tell them that my country wants peace."
That's true. If we walk in the streets of the Bronx, if we walk around New York, Washington, San Diego, in any city, San Antonio, San Francisco, and we ask individuals, the citizens of the United States, what does this country want? Does it want peace? They'll say yes.
But the government doesn't want peace. The government of the United States doesn't want peace. It wants to exploit its system of exploitation, of pillage, of hegemony through war.
It wants peace. But what's happening in Iraq? What happened in Lebanon? In Palestine? What's happening? What's happened over the last 100 years in Latin America and in the world? And now threatening Venezuela – new threats against Venezuela, against Iran?
He spoke to the people of Lebanon. Many of you, he said, have seen how your homes and communities were caught in the crossfire. How cynical can you get? What a capacity to lie shamefacedly. The bombs in Beirut with millimetric precision?
This is crossfire? He's thinking of a western, when people would shoot from the hip and somebody would be caught in the crossfire.
This is imperialist, fascist, assassin, genocidal, the empire and Israel firing on the people of Palestine and Lebanon. That is what happened. And now we hear, "We're suffering because we see homes destroyed.'
Our voice is an independent voice to represent the dignity and the search for peace and the reformulation of the international system; to denounce persecution and aggression of hegemonistic forces on the planet.
The above were excerpts, for the complete transcript, see:www.counterpunch.org/chavez09202006.html
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =- - Hugo Chavez: An Exclusive Interview with Greg Palastwww.gregpalast.com/hugo-chavez-an-exclusive-interview-with-greg-palast
2) Taking to the Streets on 9/11
- - Democracy Now! 9/11 Debate
- - Film Review: 9/11 Press for Truth
- - 911 TRUTH DVD PROJECT
Taking to the Streets on 9/11
911Truth.org Movement News
By Jerry Mazza, Associate Editor
September 18, 2006
Truly moving account of the September 11 truth actions in New York. Given all the potentially risky fault lines that weekend between the families, the police, the truth activists, and even within the movement, the cohesive and optimistic energy that marked this "anniversary" is a sign of both increasing compassion and progress, and should give us all a lot of hope. - Ed.
On the morning of 9/11, I couldn't watch the reading of names on NY1. Not five years in a row. I clicked off the ritual of bereaved families, somber politicos and media scripters and went to work on the computer. Before I knew it, it was 1 o'clock. Something gnawed. I needed to go down to Ground Zero, at least to pay my respects to the gone. Yet what I found was very alive. Thousands of 9/11 Truth Movement members shouting,, "9/11 was an inside job, 9/11 was an inside job." This interspersed with the raspy voice of Alex Jones booming the facts of the Towers' demise on a bullhorn. But this was no bull. This was a whole new ballgame.
There were cordons of cops in black and blue, white shirt officers, the brass, the suits, the shooters with burp guns and helmets, tactical cops in caps. There were police cars, SUVs, double-decker tourist buses crawling down Church Street, beeping traffic streaming up it, both sides lined with protestors in front of the PATH train entrance, the entrance to the hole, Ground Zero, visitors gawking, some raising fists, with or against us.
But above all the chant went on: "9/11 was an inside job, 9/11 was an inside job." I slipped inside the passionate crowd of protestors whose black t-shirts were lettered in white: "Investigate 9/11." Suddenly, that warm September sun, that cloudless sky, that 9/11 day, felt good again. We were alive and kicking.
Some passersby looked dumfounded that such a thought could be spoken: "9/11 was an inside job." Others smiled, like someone finally got up the guts to say it out loud. Some screamed back, "Don't help the terrorists." One provocateur tried to start a fight. He was shooed away. The two sides of the street echoed the chant.
And to the north, silver green, glassy, shining, the new Tower 7, lucky Larry's baby, looked down, ominously alone if not mostly empty, reminding us it never was hit by a plane, but somehow "was pulled," and somehow was the first and only Tower to be rebuilt. After all, Larry owned it, not just leased it like the other buildings, and managed to make upwards of $500 million on its rebuilding. It is now the headquarters of Silverstein Properties.
Larry's exact words were . . ."I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull, and we watched the building collapse."
Truncated, for the complete source article, see:http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/printer_1211.shtml
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =- - Democracy Now! 9/11 Debate
In the Media – 911Truth.org
Loose Change Filmmakers vs. Popular Mechanics
Editors of "Debunking 9/11 Myths"
Monday, September 11th, 2006
Considering Popular Mechanics trotted out its heaviest editorial guns to attack the assertions made in the movie, Loose Change, its young director and researcher defend their major points quite effectively and persuasively. It is interesting to note PM's repeated contention that immediate testimony from first responders and witnesses on the day of the attack should be ignored or discounted in favor of "expert" opinions and "official" analyses appearing months or years later. We think that may be engineer speak for Groucho Marx's classic defense, "Who you gonna believe? Me, or your lying eyes?" - Ed.
September 11, 2001 - five years after the attacks many people are asking questions about what happened on that day in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania. Websites, articles, books and documentaries have put forward a variety of alternate theories to the government's account of what happened. The most popular of these is a documentary called "Loose Change." Now, a book dealing with many of these theories has just been published by the magazine Popular Mechanics, it's called "Debunking 9/11 Myths: Why Conspiracy Theories Can't Stand Up to the Facts." In a Democracy Now! national broadcast exclusive, we host a debate between the filmmakers of Loose Change and the editors of Popular Mechanics on 9/11.
Amy Goodman: Today, a debate about 9/11. Ever since the attacks took place, many people across the country have raised a number of questions about what actually happened on that day in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania. Websites, articles, books and documentaries have put forward a variety of alternate theories to the government's account of what happened.
The most popular of these is a documentary called "Loose Change." The 80-minute film first appeared on the web in April 2005. Since then, it has had at least 10 million viewings and is described by Vanity Fair as "the first Internet blockbuster." As the popularity of "Loose Change" has soared, a book dealing with the questions it and others have raised about 9/11 has been published. It's called "Debunking 9/11 Myths: Why Conspiracy Theories Can't Stand Up to the Facts" put together by the editors of the magazine, Popular Mechanics.
Today, we talk about some of the 9/11 theories and the arguments against them.
* Dylan Avery, writer and director of "Loose Change."
* Jason Bermas, researcher for "Loose Change."
* James Meigs, editor-in-chief of Popular Mechanics; editorial team that produced "Debunking 9/11 Myths: Why Conspiracy Theories Can't Stand Up to the Facts."
* David Dunbar, executive editor of Popular Mechanics; editorial team producing "Debunking 9/11 Myths: Why Conspiracy Theories Can't Stand Up to the Facts."
AMY GOODMAN: Today, we bring you a national exclusive: a debate about 9/11. Ever since the attacks took place, many people across the country have raised a number of questions about what actually happened on that day in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania. Websites, articles, books and documentaries have put forward a variety of alternate theories to the government's account of what happened. The most popular of these is a documentary called Loose Change. The 80-minute film first appeared on the web April 2005. Since then, it's had at least 10 million viewings and is described by Vanity Fair as “the first internet blockbuster.”
As the popularity of Loose Change has soared, a book dealing with the questions it and others have raised about 9/11 has been published. It’s called Debunking 9/11 Myths: Why Conspiracy Theories Can’t Stand Up to the Facts. It’s put together by the editors of the magazine Popular Mechanics.
Truncated, for the complete source article, see:www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/09/11/1345203
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =- - Film Review: 9/11 Press for Truth
Posting to Headlines Wire of Scoop
Opinion: Michael Collins
Date: Monday, 11 September 2006
Time: 9:59 pm NZT
Film Review: 9/11 Press for Truth
9/11 Press for Truth: Film Review
By Michael Collins
Scoop Independent News
Washington, DC 9/11/06
The new documentary 9/11 Press for Truth premiered on September 10th in Washington, DC. The film played at the nearly packed Landmark E Street Cinema just around the corner from FBI headquarters. While the irony was not intentional, it was clearly appropriate.
In the film’s first five minutes, we hear FBI Director Robert Mueller tell us that the agency simply had no idea that terrorists would ever use planes to attack the United States. Apparently, he also had no idea that one of his top agents sent reports of suspicious Middle Eastern men in commercial flight schools well before 9/11. He had no idea that a 1996 plot was foiled involving the use of planes as weapons against the United States. He also forgot that at the G8 conference of world leaders in Italy just before 9/11, defenses were set up to meet the threat of airplanes used as weapons. This sequencing in the film typifies the skillful presentation of information and themes throughout 9/11 Press for Truth.
This film is a powerful, moving and intelligent exposition of the impact of 911 in the words of survivors and through the carefully collated, analyzed, and connected stories appearing in the press here and overseas. Much of the content is based on author Paul
Thompson’s The Complete 9/11 Timeline.
The press for truth begins after a brief and respectful sequence showing New Yorkers reacting to the attacks, the collapse of the North Tower, and memorial ceremonies. At that point we meet the Jersey Girls. Patty Casazza, Mindy Kleinberg, Lorie Van Auken, and Kristen Breitweiser all lost their husbands on September 1, 2001. They came together initially for mutual support. Quickly, they formed the core of a larger group of 911 survivors demanding an investigation.
Their demands for a thorough investigation, the many unanswered questions, and the resistance of the information gatekeepers form the narrative that carries the film forward. The twists and turns offer a fascinating and compelling collection of major stories (or dots) that have never been connected.
The first question is why it took two hours before any air defense was mounted on 9/11? The failed response that day is shown. We then we see a 1999 newscast describing the rapid response by six Air Force Jets to a suspicious private plane over Florida. This type of response is standard operating procedure. The point is obvious; the question devastating. How can a mystery jet over Florida get a quicker response than an attack on the United States?
The next question is introduced by the widow of a New York fireman who died on 9/11. She asks how a skyscraper could collapse due to fire when fire has never been the sole cause of a skyscraper collapse. Seeing and hearing this widow express such an obvious question in plaintive terms has a power that creates both sympathy and outrage.
The film was directed by Ray Nowosielski and written by John Duffy and Kyle Hence. Paul Thompsonâ€™s book formed the basis for much of the narrative and Larisa Alexandrovna of Raw Story was a key consultant. They offer us a remarkable artistic statement that transcends ideology and operates at the highest level of intellectual honesty, humanity, and patriotism.
For the complete article, see: www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0609/S00147.htm
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =- - 911 DVD Project - Get the Truth Out911dvdProject.com
is a web site to advance and promote the truth about what happened on 9/11/01. We have found through experience that videos are a great way to spark interest in the truth about what really happened on 9/11/01. Therefore, the particular mission of the 911dvdproject is to help spread understanding of events on that day through the distribution of DVDs that educate the viewer about the many still unanswered questions and little known facts that remain concerning 9/11.
These are the DVDs currently offered:
A. Loose Change-Second Ed.
B. Everybody’s Gotta Learn Sometime-First Ed.
C. What’s the Truth?
D. Who Killed John O’Neill?
E. Terror Storm
F. Confronting the Evidence
G. BYU Professor Steven Jones presents a case for controlled demolition of WTC 1,2 & 7 at Utah Valley State College February 6, 2006
Some of these videos can be downloaded at 911files.net
E-mail your order to: email@example.com
To place an order, send an e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org. Include the name and quantity of the DVDs that are being ordered, and of course the shipping address to which the DVDs should be sent. Any combination of DVDs is acceptable in an order. Repeat orders are encouraged since it is important to spread this information as far and as wide as possible. It may take two or three weeks to fill your order. If you wish you may send the DVDs back for redistribution even after watching them. Please pass as many discs around as you can.
We have given the courageous and patriotic producers of these films the assurance that we will not sell their works for profit. Because of postage and material costs, we actually operate at a loss. We ask that those that use our service not ask any more for the DVDs than they donated for them.
If someone truly can not afford to donate the small amount that we recommend for the DVDs, we are glad to give them away, but if too many folks don’t donate, we will not be able to replenish the discs and be forced to shut down the service.
We ask that the minimum number of DVDs per order be 5 and the maximum number be 50.
*We do not necessarily endorse every single statement made in these DVDs but agree with the general thrust of each of them. We hope that the DVDs will stimulate you to do further research into the events of that day and are sure that if you do, you will agree with us in the 9/11 Truth movement that a thorough and above board criminal investigation into what really happened that day is necessary. The American people deserve the truth; it is our patriotic duty to Demand 9/11 TRUTH!911 Mysteries
A great new DVD is now available titled 9/11 Mysteries. This is one of the most compelling graphic demonstrations of WTC controlled demolition to date (IMHO). The producer has shown interest in allowing us to offer 9/11 Mysteries here after the cost of production is covered. Very reasonable discounts are offered for quanity orders. Currently another addition to the series is in production. 911dvdproject.com encourages support for this project. ~ webmaster
Learn more at 911mysteries.com
or view the video in its intirety on google video here.For more resources to get the truth out, see:
Films that Make a Difference!and for extensive article archives on this topic, see:
Bush Conspiracy and 9/11 Investigative Reports,
looking into the unanswered questions.
3) Brad’s Blog – RFK New Diebold Expose
EXCLUSIVE: New RFK Jr. Article on Diebold in Friday's "Rolling Stone."
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who filed landmark article last June in Rolling Stone concerning evidence of a stolen 2004 Presidential Election in Ohio, is set to rock the country again in today’s Rolling Stone, The BRAD BLOG reported.
Through interviews with a number of insider sources over the past several months, Kennedy, along with co-writer Dick Russell will expose a plethora of new details in the scandalous overtaking of our public election system by private companies such Diebold, ES&S, Sequoia and others.
The Brad Blog has worked with Kennedy and Russell on this story during its development and will have EXCLUSIVE details and excerpts.
More to come: www.bradblog.com/?p=3506
Translate this Page!
The views expressed herein are the writers' own and not necessarily those of Flyby News.
A "Fair Use Policy" that describes FNs' use of copyrighted material is posted at FlybyNews.com.
Your feedback for story suggestions and networking Flyby News are welcomed and appreciated.
You can write to the publisher/editor Jonathan Mark via email: email@example.com
If you would like to receive more Flyby News alerts for the New England
region, send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org & insert "subscribe" in subject
Flyby News is educational and nonviolent in focus, and has supported critical campaigns
for a healthy environment, human rights, justice, peace, and nonviolence,
since the launching of NASA's Cassini space probe in 1997.=====News Fit to Transmit in the Post Cassini Flyby Era====> = = = = = = www.FlybyNews.com = = = = =