Flyby News
"News Fit to Transmit in the Post Cassini Flyby Era"
Plame Exposure * Home-Grown-Terrorism
01 November 2005
You have people who have no regard for the rule of law.
These aren't people who appreciate the Constitution,
to them the Constitution is an impediment, it's an obstacle,
it's something in the way, it's something to be avoided.
They are married to an ideology of global domination, of
global imperialism and they're not going to deviate from this.
-- Scott Ritter1) The White House Exposure Of Valerie Plame- - Has anyone noticed that the coverup worked?
- - Howard Dean: Indict Dick Cheney
- - Scott Ritter - "Don't Rule Out Staged Government Terror"
2) Guantanamo Desperation Seen in Suicide Attempts- - Rumsfeld's growing stake in Tamiflu
3) U.S. Military Wants to Own the Weather- - Has anyone noticed that the coverup worked?
Editor's Notes:As most expected, 22 Indictments was too much of a good thing to come true. Yet much has been accomplished with one Indictment. Most likely, (speculatively reasoning), a deal was made to reign in the Neocons. Even moderate Republicans are alarmed at the accelerating rate of the depleting below-zero national treasury, and unprecedented environmental damage, and a war with no end. Perhaps they alluded to 22 Indictments, but would settle for less, if the Neocons exit without incident by 2008. But this won't stop the bought-politicians from making the same mistakes over and over again. That is one reason why FN is supporting a conventional and grassroots political coalition to find a consensus for a candidate that voted NO for the Bush War Resolution in 2002.
The first item is the transcript of last Sunday's CBS-TV program, Sixty-Minutes, which included an interview of Joe Wilson on the harm from the administration's CIA-outing of his wife, Valerie Plame. By a CIA colleague she was noted as an expert on weapons of mass destruction. So, not only do we have the Downing Street Memo that describes the fraud connected to nonexistent weapons of mass destruction to attack Iraq, but now we also have a White House CIA-outing, nullifying a specialist, defending the US from where such weapons do exist. This fight for reclaiming a democracy in the US is not over, not by a long shot.
1) The White House Exposure Of Valerie Plame- - Has anyone noticed that the coverup worked?
- - Howard Dean: Indict Dick Cheney
- - Scott Ritter - "Don't Rule Out Staged Government Terror
The Exposure Of Valerie Plame
"Sixty Minutes"
NEW YORK, Oct. 30, 2005
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(CBS) For 18 years as an undercover agent for the CIA, Valerie Plame Wilson kept her occupation and her identity a secret, even to her own friends and family, to avoid compromising her work as a spy.
When she was exposed two years ago, it led to a federal investigation and raised questions about what would motivate such a betrayal. Would someone in the government go that far, leak her name to the press, in retaliation for her husband's public criticism of the war in Iraq?
The special prosecutor in the case, Patrick Fitzgerald, did not answer that question on Friday when he charged the vice president's Chief of Staff Lewis Libby with lying to the investigators who were trying to find out how it could have happened.
But 60 Minutes wanted to know how serious was the damage done by the leak.
The woman at the center isn't talking. But 60 Minutes Correspondent Ed Bradley did hear from her husband, her friends and fellow agents who knew her work, and helped us understand what happens when an agent for the CIA is exposed.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
"It's a spy agency. And you don't expose people working for a spy agency. And no one knew that she was working for a spy agency until she was exposed," says Jim Marcinkowski, a deputy city attorney in Royal Oak, Mich. In the late 1980's, he was a covert CIA agent spying in Central America. Like all recruits, he was sent to the agency's top-secret training facility in Virginia known simply as "the farm."
That's where he first met a 22-year-old graduate of Penn State University named Valerie. Marcinkowski says he knew her simply as Val P., since recruits went by the initial of their last name. And he says she was a natural.
"Did all of you have firearms training?" Bradley asked. "Yes," he replied.
Marcinkowski says she was good. "Some people had never fired weapons before, and some of us had. And it's always interesting when someone that has never fired a weapon kind of beats everybody else that did."
He says the three dozen members of his CIA class were a close-knit group that continued to see each other at class reunions.
Two years ago, when columnist Robert Novak put the name "Valerie Plame" into the public debate over the war in Iraq, Marcinkowski says it took him a few weeks to determine that it was "Val P." who had been compromised. "I found that particularly outrageous. It became very personal."
Marcinkowski was so angry, he went public, something former CIA agents rarely do, blaming the White House, even though nobody has been charged with the actual leak.
"We kept that trust in protecting her identity. So we held a particular trust for 18 years and never gave each other up. And when the White House did that, it was particularly outrageous, because if I have to keep those secrets, they should be held to that same kind of standard," he explains.
As the investigation into who leaked her name got underway in Washington, more details about Valerie Plame's life emerged. She spent her early years in the CIA in Europe, where she received advanced degrees from the London School of Economics and the College of Europe, in Bruges, Belgium.
In recent years, she told people she worked at an energy consulting firm called "Brewster-Jennings & Associates."
Robert Novak, the columnist who first printed her name, revealed that, too. "And she listed herself as an employee of Brewster-Jennings & Associates. There is no such firm, I'm convinced," Novak said on CNN.
He was right. Even though the business directory Dun & Bradstreet had a listing for the firm in a Boston office building, Brewster-Jennings & Associates was a CIA fiction, created to provide cover for agents like Valerie Plame.
The problem, says Marcinkowski, is that exposing Brewster-Jennings could lead foreign intelligence agencies to other spies. "There is a possibility that there were other agents that would use that same kind of a cover. So they may have been using Brewster-Jennings just like her."
Valerie Plame was also exposed as a "NOC," an agent working under non-official cover. That means she wasn't attached to a U.S. Embassy or any other government agency when she worked overseas, which would have provided her protection if she was caught spying. In other words, she had no diplomatic immunity.
Working overseas as an NOC, without official cover, was a dangerous assignment, says Marcinkowski. "With diplomatic immunity, the worst that can happen is you get kicked out of the country. You don't have that kind of a protection when you're a NOC. You're out there, what they would call naked."
"Out there" like Hugh Redmond, a NOC who was caught spying in Shanghai in 1951 and died after 19 years in a Chinese prison. To this day, the CIA denies he was an agent.
"We give our most sensitive cases to those officers serving under non-official cover," explains Melissa Mahle, who spent 14 years in the Middle East as a covert CIA operative maintaining a series of fictitious "legends," or cover stories, created by her superiors.
"I conducted espionage. I went overseas, I recruited agents," says Mahle.
She left the agency three years ago, and recently struck up a friendship with a woman whose career ran parallel to her own: Valerie Plame Wilson.
"People have said, ‘Oh, well, Valerie wasn't serving in a sensitive position. So it's not really that serious.' Well, I would say that's a very fallacious way of looking at this because a cover is for a clandestine officer can be different things at different times. We change cover. We modify cover based on how we need it," says Mahle. "If you start to unravel one part of that, you can unravel the whole thing."
Mahle says Valerie was working on important national security issues, like keeping tabs on nuclear material and the world's top nuclear scientists. "She is an expert on weapons of mass destruction. These are the kind of people that don't grow on trees."
What do agents in that division do? "They're trying to figure out, really, the hard questions of who has the capability obtaining and deploying a biological weapon. Or a chemical weapon. Who's doing it? What are those networks? What are the financial trails?" says Mahle.
The CIA has yet to conduct a formal damage assessment. The agency wanted to wait until the investigation by the special prosecutor was over.
But agency representatives have come to Capitol Hill to brief the intelligence committees about steps they've taken to "mitigate the effects of the leak."
"I think any time the identity of a covert agent is released, there is some damage. And it's serious," says Congressman Rush Holt, a Democrat from New Jersey and a member of the House Intelligence Committee.
Rep. Holt says some people Valerie Wilson came into contact with overseas, even those who didn't know she was a covert operative, could be in danger.
"Have you had assurances that the agency is handling the fallout from this leak?" Bradley asked.
"They have taken the usual procedures to protect the damage from spreading," Rep. Holt replied.
"Is it possible that someone overseas, someone is going to jail because of this?" Bradley asked Holt. "Sure, it's possible."
"Is it possible that somebody lost their life?" Bradley asked. "It's possible. I don't know," the congressman said.
Rep. Holt pointed out there has not yet been a formal assessment. "If there were, and I had been briefed on it, I couldn't talk about it."
"This was a crime against the national security of the country," says Joseph Wilson, Valerie Wilson's husband. He's a career diplomat who served in Iraq for the first President Bush, and on the National Security Council as an expert on Africa for President Clinton.
In February, 2002, he was sent by the CIA to investigate claims that Iraq was trying to buy uranium ore from Niger, a country in Africa where he had once been posted. When he returned, he told the agency such a sale was "highly unlikely."
But when the president said in his January 2003 State of the Union Address that Iraq was seeking uranium from Africa, Wilson accused the administration of lying to make a better case for war. And that, he says, is why people in the administration came after his wife.
Bradley sat down with Wilson when Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald announced the results of his two-year investigation, not charging the vice president's Chief of Staff Lewis Libby with leaking the name, but with lying and obstructing justice.
Joe Wilson says he believes someone in the White House was responsible for the leak. "It was the White House that decided they were going to go after me, and the tactic they decided to use was to go after my wife."
"Do you think that the prosecutor has gotten to or is getting to the bottom of it?" Bradley asked.
"I don't know. It's hard for me to say. This was done to silence others. This was a shot across the bow to others. The message was if you do to us what Wilson did to us, we'll do to you what we just did to Wilson's family," said Wilson.
And the damage to Valerie Plame Wilson was serious, as spelled out by the special prosecutor. "Valerie Wilson's friends, neighbors, college classmates had no idea she had another life," Fitzgerald said.
When they first met, Wilson says Plame told him she was a risk analyst for an international firm.
"But, once you were married, you had to join this cover. I mean, you couldn't tell your family, your friends," Bradley asked.
"No. The day that Mr. Novak's article appeared, my sister-in-law turned to my brother and said, ‘Do you think Joe knew?' So, not even my brother or my sister-in-law or any of my immediate family knew," Wilson recalled.
"So, no one said, ‘I sort of suspected this all the time?'" Bradley asked.
"No," Wilson replied.
Wilson says that did not surprise him at all. "As Valerie points out, most people are interested in talking about themselves and, therefore, it was very easy for a professional to shift the conversation away from her and onto other people."
When she saw Novak's column, he says, it came as a complete shock. Eighteen years of a meticulously-crafted cover, exposed in an instant.
"She felt like she had been hit in the stomach. It took her breath away. She recovered quickly because, of course, you don't do what she did for a living without understanding stress. And she became very matter of fact right afterwards. And started making lists of what she had to do to ensure that her assets, her projects, her programs and her operations were protected," Wilson said.
"Did she realize then that her career as an undercover agent for the CIA was over?" Bradley asked.
"Absolutely. Sure. There was no doubt about it in her mind. And she wondered for what," Wilson said.
"Novak also published the name of the front company that your wife used for cover, Brewster-Jennings & Associates. How would you characterize that disclosure?" Bradley asked.
"I think it was abominable. But when he published her name, it was very easy to unravel everything about her, her entire cover. You live your cover. And so you live Brewster-Jennings. So, she would have had business cards that said Brewster-Jennings on them. So, that was just insult to injury. And it was just Mr. Novak taking a second bite of the apple," says Wilson.
Wilson confirmed that as a CIA agent, his wife was working to uncover information about weapons of mass destruction. Since she is still an agency employee, Valerie Wilson has been silent. Despite the fact it has been two years since she was exposed, the CIA still won't comment on the record about the damage.
"Did your wife ask for protection from the agency?" Bradley asked.
"I don't go into security matters. But, you can be sure that we discussed security at great length with various agencies," Wilson said.
And Wilson says there have been specific threats. "There have been specific threats. Beyond that, I just can't go."
Former agent Jim Marcinkowski says one of the worst things about the leak is that it gives America's enemies clues about how the CIA operates. "She is the wife of an ambassador, for example. Now, since this happened, every wife of an ambassador is going to be suspected. Or they'll know there's a possibility that the wife of a U.S. ambassador is a CIA agent."
"I get the impression you get really angry about what happened," Bradley asked Melissa Mahle.
"Of course I do, because we're talking about lives and we're talking about capabilities. We do our work. We risk our own lives. We risk lives of our agents in order to protect our country. And when something like this happens, it cuts to the very core of what we do. We're not being undermined by the North Koreans. We're not being undermined by the Russians. We're being undermined by officials in our own government. That I find galling," Mahle said.
Valerie Wilson still reports to work every day at CIA headquarters in Langley, Va. Friends say her status as America's most famous spy makes it impossible for her to remain in the clandestine service of the CIA, a place where she's spent her entire working life.
"Have you been in contact with her recently?" Bradley asked Marcinkowski. "Yes," he replied.
"What has this done to her? How's she handling it?" Bradley asked.
"Well, first of all, CIA people don't like cameras. We don't like publicity. We operate in the background as much as possible. So she's in a very, very uncomfortable spot," Marcinkowski replied.
"So her career is then definitely been damaged by this?" Bradley asked.
"Her career has been ended," he said.
©MMV, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved.
www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/10/28/60minutes/printable994753.shtml= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
- - Has anyone noticed that the coverup worked?What the 'Shield' Covered Up
By E. J. Dionne Jr.
Tuesday, November 1, 2005; A25
Has anyone noticed that the coverup worked?
[EXCERPT]
In his impressive presentation of the indictment of Lewis "Scooter" Libby last week, Patrick Fitzgerald expressed the wish that witnesses had testified when subpoenas were issued in August 2004, and "we would have been here in October 2004 instead of October 2005."
Note the significance of the two dates: October 2004, before President Bush was reelected, and October 2005, after the president was reelected. Those dates make clear why Libby threw sand in the eyes of prosecutors, in the special counsel's apt metaphor, and helped drag out the investigation.
As long as Bush still faced the voters, the White House wanted Americans to think that officials such as Libby, Karl Rove and Vice President Cheney had nothing to do with the leak campaign to discredit its arch-critic on Iraq, former ambassador Joseph Wilson.
And Libby, the good soldier, pursued a brilliant strategy to slow the inquiry down. As long as he was claiming that journalists were responsible for spreading around the name and past CIA employment of Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame, Libby knew that at least some news organizations would resist having reporters testify. The journalistic "shield" was converted into a shield for the Bush administration's coverup..
..Fitzgerald has made clear that he wants to keep this case going if doing so will bring us closer to the truth. Lawyers not involved in the case suggest that the indictment was written in a way that could encourage Libby, facing up to 30 years in prison, to cooperate in that effort.
But there is a catch. If Libby, through nods and winks, knows that at the end of Bush's term, the president will issue an unconditional pardon, he will have no interest in helping Fitzgerald, and every interest in shutting up. If Bush truly wants the public to know all the facts in the leak case, as he has claimed in the past, he will announce now that he will not pardon Libby. That would let Fitzgerald finish his work unimpeded, and we would all have a chance, at last, to learn how and why this sad affair came to pass.
postchat@aol.com
© 2005 The Washington Post Company
www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/31/AR2005103101386.html= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
- - Howard Dean: Indict Dick Cheney31 Oct 2005 Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean is urging Leakgate Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald to indict Vice President Dick Cheney if he had anything to do with the decision of his chief of staff, Lewis Libby, to leak CIA employee Valerie Plame's identity to the media.
For this article, see:
www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/10/31/222608.shtml= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
- - Scott Ritter - "Don't Rule Out Staged Government Terror"Former UN Weapons Inspector:
Don't Rule Out Staged Government Terror
Ritter says Neo-Cons are embattled, surrounded, could
resort to desperate measures to further global domination
Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones | October 24 2005
Former United Nations weapons inspector and Marine Scott Ritter appeared on The Alex Jones Show and stated that he wouldn't rule out the possibility of the Bush administration staging a terror attack in order to jolt a wavering foreign policy agenda back on track.
Ritter compared the atmosphere within the administration to that during the time of Watergate, where
Nixon considered utilizing America's nuclear arsenal to create a devastating diversion from domestic calamity.
"Nothing this administration would do would surprise me, they're desperate right now."
"If you go back and take a look at the Nixon administration during the height of Watergate Nixon was talking about using nuclear weapons against the Soviets in the Middle East, insanity of this nature."
"When you have an irresponsible administration like the Nixon administration, like this current administration, and they start to feel embattled, surrounded, they take on a fortress like mentality where everybody becomes the enemy."
Asked if he thought a staged terror attack was possible, a scenario previously considered
by former CIA analyst Ray McGovern, Ritter responded,
"Yeah, you have people who have no regard for the rule of law. These aren't people who appreciate the Constitution, to them the Constitution is an impediment, it's an obstacle, it's something in the way, it's something to be avoided. They are married to an ideology of global domination, of global imperialism and they're not going to deviate from this."
Regarding the issue of imminent indictments of top Bush administration officials, Ritter stated,
"I think the President should be investigated to determine whether he's committed a crime and if a crime has been committed then the President must be held accountable, fully accountable, to the rule of law."
Ritter dispelled any potential charges of partisanship by stating, "If we're going to go after Bush then we have to go after Clinton."
"We've got to make sure that we set the record straight that this isn't about partisan bashing, Bush bashing. This is about reasserting the rule of law as set forth by the Constitution and reasserting the power of the people."
On the subject of which country will be subject to the next Neo-Con invasion, Ritter commented,
"There are elements within the Bush administration, especially Donald Rumsfeld's associates, Doug Feith, Wolfowitz and others whose long goal crossed the line of serving America and they started serving another country out there, Israel."
"This administration wants to go to Syria, wants to go to Iran. Iran has turned into a little more difficult of a proposition both diplomatically and militarily, and financially. So Iran may be pushed to the back-burner right now, doesn't mean it's going away, we should never forget that."
"We're going to go small first and I think that with Syria the feeling in the Bush administration is that this is a very easy target, it's one that would make Israel very happy if we took out this regime."
"I'm not sure it's going to be as easy as they think it's going to be."
Ritter's claims have continually been proven to be accurate even in the face of numerous establishment media and government attempts to defame his character.
Ritter is the latest of a rash of credible people both inside and outside of government to voice concerns that a staged terror attack blamed on Iran or Syria could be used as the pretext to instigate pre-planned invasions and further entrench a police state in the US.
Former CIA analyst and Bush 41 staffer
Ray McGovern gave similar sentiments as well as British Member of Parliament
George Galloway .
Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones | October 24 2005
www.prisonplanet.com/articles/october2005/241005weaponsinspector.htm
For items of Part 2 of this issue, 01 November 2005:2) Guantanamo Desperation Seen in Suicide Attempts- - Rumsfeld's growing stake in Tamiflu
3) U.S. Military Wants to Own the Weather- - Has anyone noticed that the coverup worked?
See: GuantanamoPain * Rum'sFlu * MilitaryWeather
Translate this Page!
The views expressed herein are the writers' own and not necessarily those of Flyby News.
A "Fair Use Policy" that describes Flyby News' use of copyrighted material is posted at flybynews.com.
Your feedback for story suggestions and networking Flyby News are welcomed and appreciated.
You can write to the publisher/editor Jonathan Mark via email: info@flybynews.com
Flyby News is educational and nonviolent in focus, and has supported critical campaigns
for a healthy environment, human rights, justice, peace, and nonviolence,
since the launching of NASA's Cassini space probe in 1997.=====News Fit to Transmit in the Post Cassini Flyby Era====> = = = = = = www.FlybyNews.com = = = = =